[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-04.txt
I believe I covered all of Margaret's outstanding comments in the 05 edits
last week.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 7:28 AM
> To: Jari Arkko
> Cc: Margaret Wasserman; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-04.txt
>
> There is going to be a -05, after a very constructive discussion
> between the authors and Cullen Jennings. So I think these points will
> be addressed at the same time.
>
> Thanks
>
> Brian
>
> Jari Arkko wrote:
> > Margaret, all,
> >
> >>Jari, please look over my comments below and make your own decision
> >>about whether to continue to hold a discuss based on these issues.
> >>Although I would like to see one more clean-up pass, I would
> >>certainly understand if you'd rather call it "good enough" at this
> >>point.
> >
> > I have re-read the document and I'm generally happy with it.
> > Thanks for the great improvement! I cleared my Discuss,
> > but added Margaret's substantive notes as a Comment.
> > I would recommend following her suggestions, however.
> >
> > --Jari
> >
> >