Brian,
excuse my late responding to this, but may I clarify your comment?
Now we can't think of how to set preference for ISPs because the
RFC3484(or its update) solve this, but does it suggests we should
consider additional section about network topologies with how to operate
multiple policies?
Or does it mean simply adding definition of xSP? If yes, I will add
like this.
(Addition into Section 2 at Terminology.)
xSP: a service provider who is an owner of the address prefix(es). It
inputs the address prefix to the Policy Broker.
Regards,
On 2006/11/25, at 1:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
It seems to me that in addition to mentioning an xSP as the
source of address selection, a corporate or campus network
operator should also be mentioned*. I'm especially thinking
of a corporate network with many points of connection to
several ISPs; that can make the policy quite complex
and location dependent.
I don't think this will change the actual technical
requirements much, but it needs to be considered.
Brian
*The draft doesn't define xSP. If it supposed to
include corporate or campus operators, this needs
to be written.
-------------------------------
Ruri Hiromi
hiromi@inetcore.com