[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RFC4214 to standard?

To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RFC4214 to standard?
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:53:21 -0700
Cc: "Dan Romascanu" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>
In-reply-to: <812697CB-0DCD-4955-8144-907C56BCF03D@cisco.com>
References: <812697CB-0DCD-4955-8144-907C56BCF03D@cisco.com>

A request was posted on the RAM list to have RFC4214 progressed to
standards-track through AD sponsorship; see:

  http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00900.html
  http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00902.html
  http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00903.html
  http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00904.html

Since RFC4214 originally came from this wg, can we have wg input
as to whether it is suitable for advancement to standards-track
through AD sponsorship at this time?

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC4214 to standard?
  - From: EricLKlein@softhome.net

References:
- draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon WGLC
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon WGLC
Next by Date: Re: RFC4214 to standard?
Previous by thread: draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon WGLC
Next by thread: Re: RFC4214 to standard?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread