A request was posted on the RAM list to have RFC4214 progressed tostandards-track through AD sponsorship; see:http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00900.html http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00902.html http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00903.htmlhttp://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ram/current/msg00904.htmlSince RFC4214 originally came from this wg, can we have wg input as to whether it is suitable for advancement to standards-trackthrough AD sponsorship at this time?
Fred, Based on the initial request(msg00900) this request is based on multiple implementations.
<cut from msg00900> This is a request to advance RFC4214 to Proposed Standard, sincemultiple and widely-deployed implementations exist. See: http://isatap.com If that is the case then I am all for moving this from experimental to standard or even best practice. But in reviewing the link I find several examples of how to, and test sites but nothing about actual installations that are up and running. Can you provide some examples of where this is "widely-deployed" so we can judge if it really is ready to move from experimental to standards track.
Thanks, Eric