RE: RFC4214 to standard?

["Durand, Alain" <Alain_Durand@cable.comcast.com>]

Fred,

Those OS are widely deployed,
Those OS implement isatap,
this does not mean that isatap,
nor any transition mechanism for that matter,
is widely used.
If the point is to treat all those mechanism fairly,
it would make sense to reclassify them all as experimental.

My .02$

   - Alain.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Templin, Fred L
> Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:08 PM
> To: EricLKlein@softhome.net
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Dan Romascanu; Ronald Bonica
> Subject: RE: RFC4214 to standard?
> 
> Eric,
> 
> > Can you provide some examples of where this is 
> "widely-deployed" so we 
> > can judge if it really is ready to move from experimental 
> to standards 
> > track.
> 
> The widely-deployed implementations I am aware of are in 
> Windows XP and Vista, cisco IOS, *BSD/Kame, and an older 
> version of the Linux/USAGI kernel. There are probably others as well.
> 
> Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com  
>  
> > Thanks,
> > Eric
> > 
> 
>