[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RFC4214 to standard?

To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, <EricLKlein@softhome.net>
Subject: RE: RFC4214 to standard?
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:10:01 -0700
Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "Dan Romascanu" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>
In-reply-to: <4607D04C.8060809@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <812697CB-0DCD-4955-8144-907C56BCF03D@cisco.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10177481B@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <courier.46077A65.000006B6@softhome.net> <4607D04C.8060809@zurich.ibm.com>

Brian,

> As we saw in Prague, the operational effect of
> your favourite coexistence protocol can even be embarassing.

Is there anything more you could say about this?

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC4214 to standard?
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>

References:
- draft-ietf-v6ops-addcon WGLC
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- RFC4214 to standard?
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- Re: RFC4214 to standard?
  - From: EricLKlein@softhome.net
- Re: RFC4214 to standard?
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: RE: RFC4214 to standard?
Next by Date: RE: RFC4214 to standard?
Previous by thread: Re: RFC4214 to standard?
Next by thread: Re: RFC4214 to standard?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread