[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Request to advance rfc4214(bis) to standards-track through ADsponsorship
- To: "Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com>
- Subject: RE: Request to advance rfc4214(bis) to standards-track through ADsponsorship
- From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:47:10 -0700
- Cc: "Ron Bonica" <rbonica@juniper.net>, <dromasca@avaya.com>, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Lindqvist Erik Kurt" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, "Fred Baker" <fred@cisco.com>, "David Ward" <dward@cisco.com>, "Durand, Alain" <Alain_Durand@cable.comcast.com>, "Bob Hinden" <bob.hinden@nokia.com>, <brian@innovationslab.net>, <tgleeson@cisco.com>, <dthaler@microsoft.com>, <mohitt@microsoft.com>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- In-reply-to: <460C0215.7050002@cisco.com>
- References: <69BD6B46-47FD-4E13-93E1-6CBB6C57F5C5@cisco.com> <EF2F0EC839870F43A6637360BC12ABD4018E3765@PACDCEXCMB05.cable.comcast.com> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10177484C@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <460BFB6D.2000309@juniper.net> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A101774850@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <460C0215.7050002@cisco.com>
> > If Mark is also busy we could ask the other ADs, but I
> > suppose another option would be to just put it as an
> > independent submission to the RFC editor?
> >
> That's always an option.
Process question - is it possible to publish as standards-track
through independent submission to the RFC editor, or is that
method only good for Informational/Experimental? (Please cite
references if possible.)
Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com