Re: Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header issues]

[itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0)]

	bob, you don't understand the problem at all.  did you see my email?

itojun

> thanks for the heads-up
> 
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 5:44 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> 
> > We are starting a discussion on the Routing Header Type 0 issue on  
> > the IPv6 mailing list.
> >
> > Bob Hinden / Brian Haberman
> > IPv6 w.g. chairs
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >> From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
> >> Date: April 25, 2007 5:39:40 PM PDT
> >> To: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
> >> Subject: Question for IPv6 w.g. on [Re: IPv6 Type 0 Routing Header  
> >> issues]
> >> Reply-To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
> >>
> >> [trimming this to just the IPv6 w.g.]
> >>
> >> We think the question for the IPv6 working group on this topic is  
> >> does the working group want to do anything to address the issues  
> >> raised about the Type 0 routing header.  Possible actions include:
> >>
> >>  1) Deprecate all usage of RH0
> >>  2) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts and routers
> >>  3) Recommend that RH0 support be off by default in hosts
> >>  4) Limit it's usage to one RH0 per IPv6 packet and limit the  
> >> number of addresses in one RH0.
> >>
> >> These examples are not all mutually exclusive.
> >>
> >> Please respond to the list with your preference and justifications.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bob Hinden / Brian Haberman
> >> IPv6 W.G. Chairs
> >>
> >> p.s. We will send a note to the other lists that the IPv6 w.g.  
> >> will be discussing this issue.