RE: OK, we need a draft...

["Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>]

Sorry, I should have said a mail list... ;0  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 1:38 PM
> To: alh-ietf@tndh.net
> Cc: 'james woodyatt'; 'v6ops'; Internet-Drafts@ietf.org; 'Ron Bonica'
> Subject: Re: OK, we need a draft...
> 
> what? A draft or a mailing list?
> 
> On Apr 27, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> 
> > I just created one, but it will not be live until Monday.
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf Of Fred Baker
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 5:56 PM
> >> To: james woodyatt
> >> Cc: v6ops; Internet-Drafts@ietf.org; Ron Bonica
> >> Subject: OK, we need a draft...
> >>
> >> OK. I, in my infinite wisdom, have decided.
> >>
> >> We need a draft. The subject, if not the title, is "Specific
> >> recommendations to vendors of devices that will provide security
> >> capabilities in Internet-enabled homes". Note that this is not
> >> limited to home in which the 802.11 access point is the only network
> >> in the home, nor it is limited to homes without. I'm thinking Apple
> >> Airport, Linksys, D-Link, God help us..
> >>
> >> Folks I want involved this include:
> >>
> >>          Tony Hain
> >>          Remi Denis-Courmont
> >>          Brian Carpenter
> >>          Christian Huitema
> >>          Ed Jankiewicz
> >>          Eric Klein
> >>          Gert Doering
> >>          Iljitsch van Beijnum
> >>          Mark Smith
> >>          Pekka Savola
> >>          Thomas Narten
> >>          Wesley Eddy
> >>          James Woodyatt
> >>
> >> Please copy me and Kurtis as well, as WG chairs. Set up a design team
> >> mailing list if you like. If someone else wants to be involved, they
> >> can negotiate the matter with you.
> >>
> >> James, can I get you to be the primary editor, accept inputs from
> >> those who are willing to work with you, and have you lead a 30 minute
> >> discussion at the coming IETF meeting around an internet draft that
> >> you will have posted by mid-June (whatever the cut-off date is)? Are
> >> you willing? This is not "ten minutes of status". This is "Let's
> >> discuss this live".
> >>
> >> I'm looking for a document with the moniker draft-ietf-v6ops-
> >> residential-cpe-00.txt, which with this email I authorize the
> >> secretariat to consider a WG draft.