Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

I would certainly like to see such a method available.

Tim

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 04:18:05AM +0900, Ruri Hiromi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The latest version of this draft is today Arifumi mentioned in his  
> solution document,
> "draft-fujisaki-dhc-addr-select-04.txt" and "draft-v6ops-addr-select- 
> ps-01.txt".
> We divided previous draft into 2 part, one for distribution protocol  
> and the other for problem statement.
> 
> At first, we wrote that draft and presented in DHC-wg.  DHC-wg chairs  
> suggested us that we need support from other wg such as v6ops. Then  
> we are here.
> 
> 
> On 2007/07/24, at 3:56, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> >What happened to
> >http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hirotaka-dhc-source-address- 
> >selection-opt-01.txt
> >and is there any other proposal for site-wide distribution of
> >address selection policy?
> >
> >As I said at the mike today, I really think we can't avoid
> >such a mechanism. There *will* be sites running multiple prefixes
> >(those too small to insist on PI space, but big enough to
> >need multiple ISPs).
> >
> >    Brian
> >
> 
> -------------------------------
> Ruri Hiromi
> hiromi@inetcore.com
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Tim