Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>]

Thanks. So does v6ops have an opinion about
draft-fujisaki-dhc-addr-select-04.txt? It seems
nothing will happen unless it's discussed here or
in ipv6.

   Brian

On 2007-07-23 21:18, Ruri Hiromi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The latest version of this draft is today Arifumi mentioned in his 
> solution document,
> "draft-fujisaki-dhc-addr-select-04.txt" and 
> "draft-v6ops-addr-select-ps-01.txt".
> We divided previous draft into 2 part, one for distribution protocol and 
> the other for problem statement.
>
> At first, we wrote that draft and presented in DHC-wg.  DHC-wg chairs 
> suggested us that we need support from other wg such as v6ops. Then we 
> are here.
>
>
> On 2007/07/24, at 3:56, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> > What happened to
> > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hirotaka-dhc-source-address-selection-opt-01.txt 
> >
> > and is there any other proposal for site-wide distribution of
> > address selection policy?
> >
> > As I said at the mike today, I really think we can't avoid
> > such a mechanism. There *will* be sites running multiple prefixes
> > (those too small to insist on PI space, but big enough to
> > need multiple ISPs).
> >
> >     Brian
>
> -------------------------------
> Ruri Hiromi
> hiromi@inetcore.com