[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
- To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
- Subject: Re: Distributing site-wide RFC 3484 policy
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:50:34 +0200
- Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EGvpaGgxy5qIF/vbllnEQvjbvm+uwxH1ev6Po9FFItgX1hb01GUU3M8vZ/S7v+cYPZwND4F1uOlzZeP5pKO/4WyJG0+Nl9KB0t9QCjb1ZMJ5u50bwFE/N5WNiawbEeWd0a1Oi+JVsgMQvRxMjNkNniDvbe/V/1qJm4G78EQE1ck=
- In-reply-to: <20070726211709.A6DFB233C4@coconut.itojun.org>
- References: <20070726211709.A6DFB233C4@coconut.itojun.org>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)
itojun,
i have been against of the idea of
- having addresses with different reachability, including site-local
and ULA (which is zombie of site-local)
I think we understand that you don't like this, but we did reach rough
consensus in the ipv6 WG to define ULAs with complete understanding that
global scope is not global reachability.
Just to repeat the argument, reachability is set by router configurations
so you cannot assume that *any* prefix has global reachability,
whether it is PA, PI, or ULA.
Brian