Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3330-for-ipv6-01.txt

[Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>]

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 20:40:26 +0200, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
> I'm coming a bit late to this (sorry)

	Apologies from me too.  At least I'm in good company. 8-)

	It would be helpful if prefixes such as 2002:a00::/24 were specifically
	mentioned as needing special attention.  This might be done by explicit
	mention of each such prefix.  Alternatively, language could be used
	which would make clear that the 6to4 image of any IPv4 block for which
	RFC3330 specifies that "Addresses within this block should not appear
	on the public Internet" should be similarly avoided.

	I believe that this would be useful both to those beginning to deploy
	IPv6 in their networks (my case) and those running a 6to4 relay  
service.


	Best regards,

	Niall O'Reilly
	University College Dublin IT Services

	PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
	Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part