"RA should be sufficient, why use DHCP?"
Maybe people like to have centrally managed solution?
I don't see how RA can be done centrally at this time?
G/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 11:35 AM
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 07:30:38PM +0100, Tim Chown wrote:
> Any comments on
>
> http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/07jul/slides/dhc-5.pdf
>
> to the v6ops list would be welcome.
Took a while - sorry.
- good summary of the problem
- the possible answers pretty much cover the solution space
- the "recommended" (bold) answer ("enhance DHCPv6 to add default
router
support") is a bit DHCP centric for my taste, but then, I'm part of
the "RA should be sufficient, why use DHCP?" camp.
good starting point for discussion.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 122119
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A.
Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279