[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:00:45 +0900 (JST)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:59:06 +0900 (JST)" <20070913065906.6EB24233C5@coconut.itojun.org>
References: <20070913065906.6EB24233C5@coconut.itojun.org>

	oops, sent privately by mistake.

itojun


> > We just don't want to run yet another service that could fail, needs 
> > configuration, and possibly debugging if client machines are unhappy.
> > 
> > Routers are there, so RAs are there anyway.  DHCP is an extra.
> 
> 	just checking: so you are voting for adding DNS server address info
> 	into RAs?
> 
> 	i just do not want RA be a kitchen sink, so DHCPv6-lite is a good-
> 	enough compromise for me.  if you piggyback DNS server address info
> 	into RAs, you do need to configure the info into every routers you got.
> 
> itojun
>

Prev by Date: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
Next by Date: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
Previous by thread: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
Next by thread: Re: [69ATTENDEES] DHCP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread