[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach

To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
From: John Curran <jcurran@mail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 17:03:06 -0500
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <47337A94.7010005@gmail.com>
References: <5FCD348C-5927-4F18-A002-0E3BF21ED5F4@NLnetLabs.nl> <47110056.70400@piuha.net> <47251FBA.9030507@gmail.com> <FBBEC281-65AB-47C6-A9D8-389DB9435D55@thetiger.com> <4726453A.2030500@gmail.com> <472664BF.4020709@ca.afilias.info> <473353D5.4040206@wanadoo.fr> <47337A94.7010005@gmail.com>

At 10:07 AM +1300 11/9/07, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> In any case, my analysis of RFC 4966 is that without
>adding state in the IPv6 host, most of the problems identified
>with NAT-PT cannot be mitigated. draft-carpenter-shanti-01
>covers this in some detail.

Brian -

  How does an ISP grow their network (using IPv6 to connect
  customers) without some way to provide the minimal level
  of backward compatibility to the existing IPv4-connected
  Internet which is provided by NAT-PT?

/John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: David Miles <davidm@thetiger.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT
  - From: Brian Dickson <briand@ca.afilias.info>
- Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
Next by Date: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
Previous by thread: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
Next by thread: Re: Follow-up work on NAT-PT - a new approach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread