[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6<->IPv4 address translation is not NAT?

To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
Subject: IPv6<->IPv4 address translation is not NAT?
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:38:59 -0500
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>

Geoff - in the v6ops meeting you said that the IPv6 transition problemis not a NAT problem. Can you explain in more detail? There must be,I think. a translation between addresses from incompatible addressspaces, just like NATv4. What do you think is the difference?


- Ralph

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IPv6<->IPv4 address translation is not NAT?
  - From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>

Prev by Date: Re: new version of draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-03.txt
Next by Date: v4 side unmodifiable
Previous by thread: draft for Translator discussion
Next by thread: Re: IPv6<->IPv4 address translation is not NAT?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread