RE: Translation versus tunneling document

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

Jordi,

A small comment on the subject line is that it may not be
an exclusive "either/or" for translation vs. tunneling but
rather "both/and". IMHO, translators belong at the edges
of IPv6 only-sites, but those "sites" may be deeply embedded
within dual-stacked sites. Recursively-nested sites within
sites are an attractive deployment scenario for some use
cases, and they are well-supported by ISATAP.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ [mailto:jordi.palet@consulintel.es] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:45 PM
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Translation versus tunneling document
> 
> I've talked with Fred after the v6ops WG meeting this 
> afternoon, and I will
> work in a document comparing the applicability of existing tunneling
> protocols and a possible translation mechanism in different scenarios.
> 
> I think this will be useful to determine if we really need 
> the translation
> mechanism for all the cases or just for a small subset, 
> making easier the
> development of that translation protocol.
> 
> I will try to get this done in the next couple of weeks, at 
> least a first
> draft. If some other people is interested in working on this, 
> please let me
> know.
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
> 
> Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
> http://www.ipv6day.org
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be 
> privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be 
> for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not 
> the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, 
> including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>