[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More CPE
On 2008-01-12 01:28, Remi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:16:09 +1300, Brian E Carpenter
>
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So a subscriber who gets stuck behind the bridge version but wants to run
>
>> an IPv6 subnet will have to buy a separate router and get a prefix from
>
>> somewhere? That's broken.
>
>
>
> I don't see how this is broken.
>
> When I bought my (IPv4-only) cable modem, I was given the choice between a
>
> model with a single Ethernet port (that is the bridge version), and the
>
> more expensive model with multiple ports (plus Wi-Fi, IIRC), which I assume
>
> is actually a modem integrated with an IPv4 NAT-router.
>
>
>
> To me, this is a feature (mind you I took the cheapest model!) not a bug.
My assumption is that this is exceptional, and the typical SOHO
user wants to buy one box providing wireless and wired connectivity
for multiple hosts. But the vendors know better than I do what
they typically sell...
Brian
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More CPE
- From: "Eduard Metz" <etmetz@gmail.com>
- Re: More CPE
- From: Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>
- References:
- Re: More CPE
- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
- Re: More CPE
- From: Remi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>