Re: multihoming requirement and NAT64

[marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>]

George Tsirtsis escribió:
> Marcelo,
>
> Just to be clear, are you talking about the NAT64 box being
> multi-homed, 
i don't think so, but this issue was brought up by Michael during the 
meeting (i was merely trying to address and generate discussion for 
every item that was was raised during the meeting)

> or are you talking about multiple NAT64 boxes serving the
> same stab network?
>
>   
that is what i understood Michael was talking about

Regards, marcelo


> George
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:38 PM, marcelo bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
>   
> > Hi,
> >
> >  during the v6ops meeting in Philadelphia, Michael brought up the issue
> >  about multihoming support for NAT64 boxes. As we know, current NAT boxes
> >  interact poorly with multihioming configurations. the question i guess
> >  whether we should impose some requirements of multihoming support for
> >  new NAT64 boxes.
> >
> >  comments?
> >
> >  Regards, marcelo
> >
> >
> >
> >     
>
>