-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Okay, so I asked the question so that it would be clearly ruled
in-scope, or out-of-scope, not because I have a particular concern/solution.
The situation I was concerned about was *not* the situation where the
NAT64 box had two (IPv4) transit connections (perhaps with different PA
prefixes --- i.e. cable + ADSL connections at your home). That
situation is within the solution space of the implementors of the NAT64
box --- they can do load balancing among connections, can BEHAVE
properly, etc.
The situation I was concerned about was whether there might be two NAT64
boxes in different locations. The IPv6 IGP might well send IPv6
packets in two different directions depending upon what might be
happening.
I don't know how to solve such a thing and I think that this scenario
should be ruled out of scope.
- --
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQEVAwUBR/LT4YCLcPvd0N1lAQLktAf/fEwB7vzLBZc1LfJNtRJPuofYkv4z7Gfc
cXSsLy9pN7/m2qMGyqj3hlfHL4nPlZxkZpOh2z1g8Dy4Khv6olr5wXuYuhAghshg
pmrovVPw6XTjk0rabT5mYRGZXTwKi+xKjydR59hrL2QLttJj43ribQKmADOyF3rM
k76GKH6ru3O7sR/doYt0MTw1qhVBqaHw4ya82H+a5xTOKFWcxRgkaZ+6smERucM7
7YCBbXKXK5GpQXdzRrc7qfbhF/OG69e3UlVtyEQUNTY93ZV18CFlTdRZOo+PIGGe
dFJwyN0/p65qxIjVUT0TBiWA7nz/sqFFWnJqXy8Fwgl2YB8bLAR1og==
=KbDU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----