Remi,
- "No change at all in the subsriber sites" seems strange to me.
Obviously there has to be a change in the border between the subscriber site and the v6-only network. The tunneling box needs to do something. But no changes in the hosts in the subscriber side, for instance.
Right. On initial look, your mechanism seems more of a general nature than the specific case sent to SOFTWIRE.- Any WG is fine. The only concern is that respective scopes of Softwire and Behave aren't, at the end, both so restrictive that a solution like APBP, that uses tunnels and doesn't use NATs in all cases, has no place to be discussed.However, generally speaking other protocol work will go elsewhere, as soon as we know what that work is. The reason why SOFTWIRE is having a head start is that they are attacking a separable, reasonably well understood part of the overall space that fits the profile of an existing WG. We are looking at rechartering BEHAVE for the rest of the work.
Jari