[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario

To: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:07:44 +1200
Cc: Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=P+Efs/Kwx7REAXAKIbAkjWHzbV/byEEomthI6KfrI9CPQwkbh/diOxWMOeYpilLXAL Rryj2Ll5ikvdeSUxAvcbSYXt5UQdHaCXT532kv3PHmPi9TuUbGBWG9OSS6H2vTbYnIA5 7dd/K6i7SzZR+Ft693dl45xosaHKQDO01qdFk=
In-reply-to: <C47CE31D.12701%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
References: <C47CE31D.12701%alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

On 2008-06-17 19:42, Alain Durand wrote:
> On 6/17/08 3:38 AM, "Rémi Després" <remi.despres@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Alain Durand  - Le 6/17/08 3:29 AM :
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> Please note that this work (464pb statement & solution) is taken to
>>> softwires.
>> is this to imply that the following drafts should from now on be
>> discussed in Softwires?
>> - draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00.txt
>> - draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64-00.txt
>> Any pointer to clarify where we stand would be useful.
> 
> No. I'm only talking about Nat464.

And I was referring to draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement.

If 464 solves this problem, fine, but we should keep the
overview in v6ops, I believe.

   Brian

References:
- Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
  - From: Alain Durand <alain_durand@cable.comcast.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Next by Date: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Previous by thread: Re: Tunnel-to-NAT scenario
Next by thread: 464 scanarios - identifying the variety
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread