Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review

["Ole Troan" <otroan@employees.org>]

> 4) RIPv6
>
> Running RIPv6 between routers within the home might be OK, although it all
> depends on how the distribution of the prefixes is done, maybe a combination
> of default route upstream plus a route downstream toward the delegated
> router will be enough.
>
> However, running RIPv6 between the CPE and the ISP is a whole different ball
> game. We are looking at other solutions (DHCPv6 message interception) for
> prefix route injection as route announcement coming from residential
> customers are hard to trust.

quite. you can't run RIP in this scenario without solving the glaring
security problem.
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stenberg-v6ops-pd-route-maintenance/draft-stenberg-v6ops-pd-route-maintenance-00.txt
for details.

/ot