RE: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review

["Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>]

Right. This was the 3rd solution we had alluded to in our emails but not
pointed to it since we authors are leaning towards the dhcv6 snooping by
the aggregation router. 

Hemant 

-----Original Message-----
From: ichiroumakino@gmail.com [mailto:ichiroumakino@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Ole Troan
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 5:53 PM
To: Alain Durand
Cc: Hemant Singh (shemant); v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Subject: Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for
review

> 4) RIPv6
>
> Running RIPv6 between routers within the home might be OK, although it

> all depends on how the distribution of the prefixes is done, maybe a 
> combination of default route upstream plus a route downstream toward 
> the delegated router will be enough.
>
> However, running RIPv6 between the CPE and the ISP is a whole 
> different ball game. We are looking at other solutions (DHCPv6 message

> interception) for prefix route injection as route announcement coming 
> from residential customers are hard to trust.

quite. you can't run RIP in this scenario without solving the glaring
security problem.
http://tools.ietf.org/draft/draft-stenberg-v6ops-pd-route-maintenance/dr
aft-stenberg-v6ops-pd-route-maintenance-00.txt
for details.

/ot