[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-00 - are changes in dualstack hosts acceptable or not?



Rémi Denis-Courmont escribió:
Le vendredi 25 juillet 2008 18:01:38 marcelo bagnulo braun, vous avez écrit :
Now, the nice thing about requirements is that when you read
them into detail, they can be interpreted in both ways.
No. A dual-stack host is NOT a v4-only host. If you read the requirements to 
the letter, nothing excludes changes to dual-stack nodes. But I humbly think 
the real question is not what the current requirements say.
  
So, the question is: is a dual stack host a v6 host (i.e. changes are
acceptable) or is it a v4 host (i.e. changes are not acceptable)?
Regardless of the current requirements, I would argue it is not acceptable 
that dual-stack nodes need to be modified, for the exact same reason as it is 
not acceptable that IPv4-only nodes need to be modified: deployment would be 
highly impractical.
  
do you think it is acceptable to require some manual configuration in 
them to make them work?
Regards, marcelo