Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req-0: protocols supported

[Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>]

Le vendredi 25 juillet 2008 19:07:48 marcelo bagnulo braun, vous avez écrit :
> Question: what is the rationale we include TLS here? souyld we have a
> citeria of which protocols shoudl be in this req?

Being (wrongly) cut and pasted from the STUN/TURN specs??

> Question: should we move DCCP and SCTP to MUST rahter than SHOULD?
> (Magnus, is this what you were requesting in your emails before?)

I can't comment on SCTP. But...

If TCP can be translated, DCCP can be translated.
If UDP can be translated, UDP-Lite can be translated.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/