[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: But are we talking IPv6 only? That's how I read the draft. (Re: Some suggestions for draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-03)



On Aug 28, 2008, at 13:05, Templin, Fred L wrote:
[I wrote:]

The minimum set of models I think we should consider are..

A) CPE is a router connected to a native IPv6 service provider with
prefix delegation.  Note: this includes dual-stack-lite CPE, as
currently proposed.

B) CPE is an IPv4/NAT router connected to a service provider where
IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling is available with a default route to
the public
default-free zone, e.g. 6to4, tunnel-broker, etc.

Are there *any* other realistic models to consider for residential CPE?

CPE is an IPv4/NAT router connected to a service provider
where IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling is available with a default
route to a border gateway for the service provider, e.g.,
ISATAP (with private IPv4 address on the CPE's provider-
facing interface).


Please correct me if I'm wrong... that's just B) where the tunnel is ISATAP. Right?


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering