I did not include some related work on tunneling, that maybe should be.Please comment if I have missed any drafts, or mis-characterized any of these as to WG, status or category. Or any other suggestions to make it more useful.
v6ops WG Behave WG Softwires WG Other or unspecified WG Framework, scenarios, comparison *Draft-baker-behave-v4v6-framework* Draft-arkko-townsley-coexistence Draft-wing-nat-pt-replacement-comparison Draft-despres-sam-scenarios Problem Statements, requirements *Draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-pb-statement-req* Draft-miyata-behave-prefix64 Draft-jennings-behave-nat6 Solutions /Draft-despres-v6ops-apbp/ *draft-baker-behave-v4v6-translation* *Draft-durand-softwire-dual-stack-lite* Draft-despres-sam *draft-bagnulo-behave-dns64* *draft-bagnulo-behave-nat64* Draft-baker-behave-ivi /Draft-xli-behave-ivi/ *draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity* “helpers” *Draft-denis-behave-v4v6exthdr* Ed Jankiewicz - SRI InternationalFort Monmouth Branch Office - IPv6 Research Supporting DISA Standards Engineering Branch 732-389-1003 or ed.jankiewicz@sri.com
Attachment:
roadmap.doc
Description: MS-Word document