RE: Agenda issue

[Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>]

Hi, Fred,

We have submitted a new draft, draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00. I think we are
already on the vows agenda. Are we? If no yet, please count us in. Thanks.

Best regards,

Sheng 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
>[mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
>Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:16 AM
>To: IPv6 Operations
>Subject: Agenda issue
>
>I have gotten a number of folks asking for time on the agenda, but I 
>have a problem:
>
>
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   19268 Sep 10 05:33 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra- 
>guard-01.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   61870 Sep 29 08:52 draft-miyata-v6ops- 
>snatpt-02.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   48468 Oct  1 10:58 draft-endo-v6ops- 
>dnsproxy-01.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   43841 Oct 15 10:48 draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel- 
>security-concerns-
>01.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   18562 Oct 15 10:48 draft-krishnan-v6ops- 
>teredo-update-04.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   53090 Oct 30 10:22 draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe- 
>router-03.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   36662 Nov  3 10:15 draft-bajko-v6ops-port- 
>restricted-ipaddr-a
>ssign-02.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   48973 Nov  3 11:06 draft-luo-v6ops-6man- 
>shim6-lbam-00.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   30429 Nov  3 14:26 draft-chown-v6ops-rogue- 
>ra-02.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred  134587 Nov  3 16:14
>draft-thaler-v6ops- teredo-extensions-02.tx t
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   16462 Feb 17 14:52 draft-rgaglian-v6ops- 
>v6inixp-01.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred    9716 Feb 18 08:01 draft-denis-v6ops-nat- 
>addrsel-00.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   41369 Feb 23 22:05 draft-bnss-v6ops- 
>upnp-00.txt
>-rw-rw-r--  1 fred  fred   19211 Mar  4 14:11 draft-vyncke-vdv-v6ops- 
>conf-stats-00.txt
>
>
>I see four new drafts post-Minneapolis. The Rogue RA and Teredo drafts, 
>whose last call completed several months ago and the write-up is 
>awaiting new drafts, don't have new drafts.
>
>Hello? Anyone out there? I need new drafts (cut-off date is Friday) for 
>anything folks expect to discuss in the WG meeting...
>