Re: draft-chown-v6ops-rogue-ra-03 (Re: Agenda issue)

[JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <Jinmei_Tatuya@isc.org>]

At Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:14:31 -0700,
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

> You have made new comments on Tim's problem statement here. My  
> question is one of diminishing returns - would you rather that Tim  
> updated the draft (in April) before I sent the thing to Ron, or should  
> Ron consider these to be early "IETF last call" comments? If you want  

I actually don't care, but at least I wouldn't require updating it
before you send it to Ron.  My latest comments are mostly editorial
and (I believe) can be addressed later with IESG comments.

> these handled before sending this to Ron, do you expect to make  
> additional comments when he posts that draft? At what point would you  
> agree that the problem statement is "close enough"?

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.