[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00

To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:25:52 -0800
Cc: "'Sheng Jiang'" <shengjiang@huawei.com>, "'IPv6 Operations'" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "'Brian Carpenter'" <brian@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, <guoseu@huawei.com>, <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <110c01c99e03$c46343a0$c2f0200a@cisco.com>
References: <7FAE1435-0FE1-4C23-B8BF-151D58AF5341@cisco.com> <01d401c99d74$c9600490$db0c6f0a@china.huawei.com> <110c01c99e03$c46343a0$c2f0200a@cisco.com>


On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:32 PM, Dan Wing wrote:

For sure. We know the draft name rules. When we wrote the draft,we were not sure which WG it should be submitted. It seems relevantto both v6ops and behave.
As a BEHAVE co-chair, I haven't seen a request for agenda time fordraft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00, nor any discussion about the drafton the BEHAVE mailing list.

It may be that Brian asked me first. He was of the opinion that thisis more operational in nature than about the specifics of the NAToperation, and I agreed to give it some air time. We'll see whathappens to it.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>

References:
- Re: Agenda issue
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- RE: Agenda issue
  - From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>
- draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
  - From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
Next by Date: RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
Previous by thread: Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft
Next by thread: RE: draft-jiang-incremental-CGN-00
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread