Re: Posted a new copy of CPE Rtr draft

[Rémi Després <remi.despres@free.fr>]

Le 20 juil. 09 à 19:34, james woodyatt a écrit :

> On Jul 20, 2009, at 09:07, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> > Most important issue:
> >
> > "The CPE Router may also support prefix sub-delegation."
> >
> > We should make this a MUST. I don't want to end up in the  
> > situation where I get a crappy DSL IPv6 CPE from my ISP and I  
> > can't use my own CPE because there is no subdelegation.

Agreed that this is a goal.
> Careful with that axe... if we're going to require prefix sub- 
> delegation in best-practice CPE routers, then I contend we  
> absolutely need to specify how that's done with zero configuration.

Agreed

>   Are we ready to do that yet?  I don't believe we are.  Very happy  
> to be proven wrong about that.

Agreed that we are not ready yet.

To make progress, my work on SAM (draft-despres-sam-03) includes an  
attempt at providing a solution.
The approach will be presented at the Intarea session, Wednesday  
15:10-16:10.
The ID abstract says "... Global prefixes delegated by a zone to its  
child interfaces can be obtained by autoconfiguration, thanks to to a  
bidirectional correspondence between SAM local addresses and SAM  
global prefixes..."

See you in Stockholm to discuss it (if you have time for this subject).

Regards,
RD