Re: draft-wbeebee-ipv6-cpe-router-04 comments

[james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>]

On Mar 25, 2009, at 16:06, james woodyatt wrote:
> Please let me clarify my remarks and narrow my request somewhat, now  
> that I've had a chance to review more of the CPE Router draft.  I am  
> only interested in such RFC 4191 messages when a valid PIO has been  
> received on the WAN link with L=1.  No other cases are interesting.

I take it back.  It's interesting in the other cases as well.  Two CPE  
routers attached to the same link will exchange their prefixes with  
MSR advertisements regardless of whether the RAs from the service  
provider have PIO options in them.  As they should.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering