Re: New Version Notification for draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn

[Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>]

Janos,

(Delayed reply, sorry)


On 2009-05-20 15:25, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> 
> 
> Janos Mohacsi
> Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects
> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
> 
> On Wed, 20 May 2009, JiangSheng 66104 wrote:
> 
>>> A document such as this is very helpful and I thank the authors.
>>> One concern I have about this kind of model is the widespread
>>> ICMP filtering in IPv4 networks. I see many ISPs that filter ICMPv6
>>> just as they do with IPv4 and has been causing problmes. This
>>> is especially important in a tunnel based solution such as this.
>>
>> Hi, Seiichi, thanks for your reply. I understand your concern. Yes,
>> ICMP fliter is a problem. We will take this in count later.
> 
> They should have a look at this draft:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4890
> 

Do you think the draft needs to do any more than recommending to follow
the recommendations in 4890? It seems as if that should be sufficient.

Any other points in this draft that we should fix before the cutoff
date?

    Brian