[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn

Fred,
 
> Well, yes. My understanding is that the topic of CGNs is moving to
> behave, and so should be submitted to behave. You can verify with the
> behave chairs.

The subject matter of this document seems more concerned
with what IPv6 operational functions could be placed on a
platform that might also support a CGN function, rather
than the behavioral aspects of CGN itself. If the bulk
of the material is about IPv6 transitions, wouldn't that
qualify the document to remain targeted to this group?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com