From our perspective, it was an inadvertent omission. We're happy to rectify that in the future.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org on behalf of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Sun 7/26/2009 3:51 PM
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
> Thanks for all your replies. Indeed, what Wes and I did in our IETF
> IPv6 CPE Rtr doc is to try and write one common document that works for
> cable, DSL, and even 3GPP legacy wireless data networks (3GPP was
> low-hanging fruit for our document because with a few minor additions we
> could satisfy their demands).
I'd just want to clarify that my intent in my opinions regarding this
draft was to make it work in ETTH deployments as well. I hope this was
just an omission in listing technologies and not a statement from the
authors regarding the intents of the document to exclude ETTH?
I don't know the extent of L2 switches used in delivering ETTH across the
world, but I'd guess it's in the millions of subscribers getting their
Internet access this way.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se