RE: New Version Notification for draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00

["Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <wbeebee@cisco.com>]

If you have specific requirements from the ETTH world that are not being
covered by other deployments, then we would be happy to include them.

- Wes 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 5:52 PM
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for
draft-donley-ipv6-cpe-rtr-use-cases-and-reqs-00

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:

> Thanks for all your replies.  Indeed, what Wes and I did in our IETF
> IPv6 CPE Rtr doc is to try and write one common document that works 
> for cable, DSL, and even 3GPP legacy wireless data networks (3GPP was 
> low-hanging fruit for our document because with a few minor additions 
> we could satisfy their demands).

I'd just want to clarify that my intent in my opinions regarding this
draft was to make it work in ETTH deployments as well. I hope this was
just an omission in listing technologies and not a statement from the
authors regarding the intents of the document to exclude ETTH?

I don't know the extent of L2 switches used in delivering ETTH across
the world, but I'd guess it's in the millions of subscribers getting
their Internet access this way.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se