Re: R41 in draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-07

[james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>]

On Jul 31, 2009, at 13:33, teemu.savolainen@nokia.com wrote:
> As the work is in progress, at this point the document could say  
> instead:"Internet Gateway Device profile of the Universal Plug And  
> Play protocol is being extended for IPv6."

Fair enough.  I'll make that change in the -08 revision.

> I agree with Barbara that second sentence of R41 is not appropriate.  
> What would be the possible replacement for the MUST, if that is  
> taken as compromise approach?

I think it should suffice to delete the second sentence from R41  
entirely.  It would then read as follows:

   R41: Gateways SHOULD implement a protocol to permit applications to
   solicit inbound traffic without advance knowledge of the addresses  
of
   exterior nodes with which they expect to communicate.


--
james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
member of technical staff, communications engineering