[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02.txt



Hi Bernard,

Thanks again for your review.

I corrected all the typos for the 03 version and I have the following comments:

[BT1]IÕd like to have a dedicated paragraph on ÇÊMonitoringÊÈ that gathers information spread in the document
ok, this is an important change I will take care of this before next release.

[BT2]Or 2^4Ê?
2^16 is correct. You get 4 HEX characters, each one of them represent 4 bits 4x4=16.

[BT3]Not sure to understand why ÉÊ;)
I was just mentioning that when using the numbering as in example (1) and considering how solicited-node multicast addresses are constructed. This text came after AMS-IX paper on ND.

Roque.


On Oct 1, 2009, at 4:27 PM, Bernard Tuy wrote:


====BT: Hi again,

I retrieved the paper where I wrote first all the modifs.

Then I recreated the file and stored it as a PDF doc.

It's attached to this email.

 Hope it'll help you, but no major changes have been done (I guess you can simply use the version I sent to you and just modifiy what you don't agree with.)

 Most important thing I propose is to make a separate paragraph for the Monitoring of IPv6 at IXes

 Cheers,

 +Bernard T.
---

Roque Gagliano wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bernard,
I tried in different computers to open the word file that you have sent me but in every occasion the change tracks is not showing. Could you please save it as Word 2003 or PDF?
thanks,
Roque.
On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:57 AM, Bernard Tuy wrote:

====BT: Dear Chairmen,

   As proposed at the last IETF meeting in Stockholm, I reviewed the draft mentioned in the subject line.

   As said to the author (in Cc:), I find it useful and quite complete.

   Though, I suggest to gather information related to monitoring IPv6 traffic and switch resources, in a dedicated paragraph.

   Couple of typos and misspellings have been corrected as well.

   I attach to this email the modified version of this draft I sent back to the author.

   If I've something more to do for this review process, please just let me know.

Thanx & cheers,

+Bernard T.

PJ: 1
<BTreview_draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02.doc>
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
LACNIC
roque@lacnic.net
GPG Fingerprint: E929 06F4 D8CD 2AD8 9365  DB72 9E4F 964A 01E9 6CEE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkrEuB8ACgkQnk+WSgHpbO4rKACfcMVtWnzjGdZ4WfqRr0BbbV7J
GMcAn0Jh8vKfnHSfMYArop8ZLOHfrRr4
=jUMC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<BT2review_draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-02.pdf>

-------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
LACNIC
GPG Fingerprint: E929 06F4 D8CD 2AD8 9365  DB72 9E4F 964A 01E9 6CEE

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part