[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Agenda call

To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Agenda call
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:20:33 -0700
In-reply-to: <4ACD0BD3.4080705@gmail.com>
References: <E0A33250-B378-4CC4-AAFD-5045E60CFF03@cisco.com> <4ACD0BD3.4080705@gmail.com>

The authors wanted to ask about this at the last IETF meeting, and thediscussion around the document told me that it wasn't ready forworking group status.

Opinions at this point? Does this document represent something theworking group wants to take on?




On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

I'm not sure if Sheng is back on line, so let me say
that we want to propose WG adoption of
draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-03.txt

It's been updated according to comments received by
September 25. We could describe those updates in a short
agenda slot.

  Brian

On 2009-10-08 04:54, Fred Baker wrote:

We have two sessions scheduled in Hiroshima. This is a call foragenda
items. Who wants time to talk?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Agenda call
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>

References:
- Agenda call
  - From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Re: Agenda call
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Agenda call
Next by Date: Re: Agenda call
Previous by thread: Re: Agenda call
Next by thread: RE: Agenda call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread