RE: Agenda call

["Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:21 PM
> To: IPv6 Operations
> Subject: Re: Agenda call
> 
> The authors wanted to ask about this at the last IETF meeting, and the
> discussion around the document told me that it wasn't ready for
> working group status.
> 
> Opinions at this point? Does this document represent something the
> working group wants to take on?

I reviewed the document, and IMHO it is stable enough
and relevant enough to take on as a wg item.

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com
 
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > I'm not sure if Sheng is back on line, so let me say
> > that we want to propose WG adoption of
> > draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-03.txt
> >
> > It's been updated according to comments received by
> > September 25. We could describe those updates in a short
> > agenda slot.
> >
> >   Brian
> >
> > On 2009-10-08 04:54, Fred Baker wrote:
> >> We have two sessions scheduled in Hiroshima. This is a call for
> >> agenda
> >> items. Who wants time to talk?
> >>
> >>
>