[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Some comments on draft-ietf-v6ops-v6inixp-03.txt



Hello, Roque,

Here's some feedback on the aforementioned I-D.

* Editorial *

Abstract:

>    This document provides a guide for IPv6 deployment in Internet

s/a guide for/guidance on/


>    Exchange Points (IXP).  It includes information regarding the switch

s/information/advice/


>    fabric configuration, the addressing plan and general organizational
>    tasks to be performed.  IXPs are mainly a layer 2 infrastructure and

s/to be/that need to be/



>    in many case the best recommendations state that the IPv6 data,

s/case/cases/
s/state/suggest/


Introduction:

>    Most Internet Exchange Points (IXP) work on the Layer 2 level, making
>    the adoption of IPv6 an easy task.

s/work on/work at/


I found it hard to parse this sentence:

> This document clarifies the impact of IPv6
>    on a new or an existing IXP that may or may not fit any particular
>    deployment.



Section 2:

> However, some management
>    functions require explicit IPv6 support (such as switch management,
>    SNMP support and flow analysis exportation) and this should be
>    assessed by the IXP operator.

Include a (Informative)  reference to the SNMP spec.


>        scenario, participants will typically configure dual stack

s/dual stack/dual-stack/


BTW, in this text:

>        scenario, participants will typically configure dual stack
>        interfaces, although independent port can be an option.

You meant something like "...will typically configure interfaces as
dual-stack, although independent interfaces could be possibly used for
each version of IP"?


>        traffic.  If IXP participants are already using Virtual LAN
>        (VLAN) tagging on their routers interfaces that are facing the
>        IXP switch,

Rephrase as "If IXP participants are already using Virtual LAN (VLAN)
tagging on those interfaces of their routers that are facing the IXP
switch...."



>    Conversely, the dual stack implementation allows a quick and capital
>    cost-free start-up for IPv6 support in the IXP, allowing the IXP to

s/dual stack/dual-stack/

Maybe s/capital cost-free/inexpensive/ ?

P.S.: More in the pipeline!

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1