Re: DUNDi

[Duane <duane@e164.org>]

Randy Bush wrote:

> sorry.  i never meant to imply that i was any sort of enum supporter.
> i regret assisting the design, but did not realize my stupidity until
> mankin applied the clue-by-four.  who the heck needs to look up phone
> numbers in the dns?  jeez!

The main reason you regret it is because you worked out it goes against 
your current business model in the long term, frankly there is nothing 
wrong with looking numbers up in the fact that DNS scales pretty darn 
well, and will continue to be about for a very long time. The main 
reason ENUM isn't being supported en mass is because of the loss of 
income on per minute calls.

--

Best regards,
 Duane

http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net!
http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers

"I do not try to dance better than anyone else.
	I only try to dance better than myself."

--
To unsubscribe send a message to voip-peering-request@psg.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
An archive is at <http://psg.com/lists/voip-peering/>.