Mail Index
Thread Index
Re: DUNDi
From
: Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
AW: DUNDi
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: James Seng <james@seng.cc>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Re: DUNDi
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: "Forrest W. Christian" <fwc@mt.net>
Re: DUNDi
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
RE: Peering Presentation
From
: "Ron Dallmeier" <ron@xena.ca>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: Impressions of Fall VON
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: Not Voice Peering, but related... Peerio
From
: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Antonio Querubin <tony@aloha.net>
RE: DUNDi
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: Impressions of Fall VON
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Impressions of Fall VON
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Not Voice Peering, but related... Peerio
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Antonio Querubin <tony@aloha.net>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
RE: Peering Presentation
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
RE: Peering Presentation
From
: "Ron Dallmeier" <ron@xena.ca>
DUNDi: big brother is watching you
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
RE: Peering Presentation
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
Re: [IP] F.C.C. to Seek Net Telephone Oversight
From
: Bram Dov Abramson <bda@bazu.org>
[IP] F.C.C. to Seek Net Telephone Oversight
From
: Gregory Hicks <ghicks@cadence.com>
Re: Peering Presentation
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: Peering Presentation
From
: "Ron Dallmeier" <ron@xena.ca>
Re: Peering Presentation
From
: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
Peering Presentation
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
RE: DUNDi
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
Re: DUNDi
From
: Tracy R Reed <treed@copilotconsulting.com>
DUNDi
From
: Irwin Lazar <ilazar@burtongroup.com>
Re: VoIP peering technology review: request for information
From
: Duane <duane@e164.org>
VoIP peering technology review: request for information
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
VoIP Peering face-to-face at NANOG?
From
: "Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
Verisign to enter VoIP Market
From
: Irwin Lazar <ilazar@burtongroup.com>
Re: SIPphone Peering With UC San Diego
From
: Michael Robertson <michael@linspireinc.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
Re: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@schiefner.de>
Re: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "William B. Norton" <wbn@equinix.com>
Re: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme@multicasttech.com>
Re: SIPphone Peering With UC San Diego
From
: Tim Winders <twinders@southplainscollege.edu>
Re: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: SIPphone Peering With UC San Diego
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: Gregory Hicks <ghicks@cadence.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "William B. Norton" <wbn@equinix.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "William B. Norton" <wbn@equinix.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "William B. Norton" <wbn@equinix.com>
Re: SIPphone Peering With UC San Diego
From
: "CJ Benson" <voip@livevoip.com>
SIPphone Peering With UC San Diego
From
: Michael Robertson <michael@linspireinc.com>
RE: Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
Another VoIP Peering Session
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Fall VON Session on VoIP Peering
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
ipcb
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
warning
From
: fedor@checkmatecomm.com
foto
From
: "Dgolding" <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Interview with Lane Patterson of Equinix on VoIP and Peering
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
FW: Recommended reading on Numbering
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
UK OFCOM Consultation - ENUM potential? [ was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? ]
From
: Peter Gradwell <peter@gradwell.com>
RE: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: "Tom Leh" <tleh@voiceglo.com>
Re: last mile prioritization (was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? )
From
: Jere Retzer <jere@easystreet.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: last mile prioritization (was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? )
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: last mile prioritization (was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? )
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: last mile prioritization (was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? )
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: last mile prioritization (was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? )
From
: Mark R. Lindsey <lindsey@e-c-group.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Irwin Lazar <ilazar@burtongroup.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
last mile prioritization (was Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point? )
From
: Chip Sharp <chsharp@cisco.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Mark R. Lindsey <lindsey@e-c-group.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Christian Schlatter <schlatter@switch.ch>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Michael Haberler <mah@eunet.at>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Enterprise VoIP Peering Point?
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Neustar announced ENUM services...
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: Infiniroute launches voip peering service
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Infiniroute launches voip peering service
From
: Irwin Lazar <ilazar@burtongroup.com>
Re: OSP
From
: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
OSP
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Betr.: Re: e.164/text destination table?
From
: "Paul Brand" <Paul.Brand@Stratix.nl>
Re: Slightly off-topic, but of huge impact
From
: Joe Provo <jzp-voipp@rsuc.gweep.net>
Re: e.164/text destination table?
From
: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@schiefner.de>
Re: 'IRS tax threat chills VoIP'
From
: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@schiefner.de>
e.164/text destination table?
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
This seems to be new...
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Slightly off-topic, but of huge impact
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: 'IRS tax threat chills VoIP'
From
: "Allison Hift" <AHIFT@becker-poliakoff.com>
Sales chatter
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
RE: voip-transit
From
: "Baruch Sterman" <baruch@kayote.com>
RE: voip-transit
From
: Ingo Flaschberger <if@cableone.at>
RE: voip-transit
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
RE: voip-transit
From
: "Michael Jackson" <michael.jackson@get2.net>
voip-transit
From
: Ingo Flaschberger <if@cableone.at>
'IRS tax threat chills VoIP'
From
: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@schiefner.de>
OSP integration into Asterisk
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: MGCP or H.323 with Asterisk
From
: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
MGCP or H.323 with Asterisk
From
: Ron Dallmeier <ron@xena.ca>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
Re: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
Re: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Tracy R Reed <treed@copilotconsulting.com>
Re: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
Re: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Hank Nussbacher <hank@interall.co.il>
Re: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
[IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists
From
: Gregory Hicks <ghicks@cadence.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
RE: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Dave Siegel <dave@siegelie.com>
SIP-T and Q.Sig
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: "Steve Heap" <sheap@rfidexchange.com>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: No need for PSTN numbers -- use inet "phone numbers"
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
re: VOIP peering questions
From
: Steve Maloney <smaloney@ctcweb.net>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Stephen Stuart <stuart@tech.org>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
RE: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Blaine Christian <blaine.christian@mci.com>
Re: No need for PSTN numbers -- use inet "phone numbers"
From
: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs@schiefner.de>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
E164.org Updates
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
List administrativa and archives
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: "Todd T. Fries" <todd@fries.net>
Re: VOIP Peering Questions
From
: Mark R. Lindsey <lindsey@e-c-group.com>
VOIP Peering Questions
From
: "Jere Retzer" <jere@easystreet.com>
Re: NON-Peering VoIP List
From
: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Re: NON-Peering VoIP List
From
: joshua sahala <voip@sahala.org>
NON-Peering VoIP List
From
: Herman Harless <herman@ntelos.net>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: e911 & 411 Directory Services
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: e911 & 411 Directory Services
From
: Andre Gironda <andre@operations.net>
e911 & 411 Directory Services
From
: "Joe Goldberg" <joseph@ezzi.net>
Re: Routing technology survey
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: Routing technology survey
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Routing technology survey
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
RE: Routing technology survey
From
: "Rob Wise" <Rob.Wise@comindico.com.au>
Re: Routing technology survey
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Routing technology survey
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Verisign and VOIP Conferences
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: e164.isc.org strengths (was Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?)
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: Regulatory Drivers in all of this
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Biased Discussion
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: e164.isc.org strengths (was Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?)
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: Regulatory Drivers in all of this
From
: Andre Gironda <andre@operations.net>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Regulatory Drivers in all of this
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: e164.isc.org strengths (was Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?)
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Mark R. Lindsey <lindsey@e-c-group.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Regulatory Drivers in all of this
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: Blocks of numbers
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Regulatory Drivers in all of this
From
: "Mark S. Fedor" <fedor@checkmatecomm.com>
Re: Public VoIP ENUM
From
: Duane <support@e164.org>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Michael Robertson <michael@lindows.com>
e164.isc.org strengths (was Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?)
From
: Andre Gironda <andre@operations.net>
Re: Monday VoIP peering wrap-up stew
From
: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Re: Monday VoIP peering wrap-up stew
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Mark R. Lindsey <lindsey@e-c-group.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Chip Sharp <chsharp@cisco.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Monday VoIP peering wrap-up stew
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Chip Sharp <chsharp@cisco.com>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono@vinny.org>
Re: Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Getting NANPA to designate a non-geographic area code?
From
: Michael Robertson <michael@lindows.com>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: "Linus Surguy" <linus@magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: "Linus Surguy" <linus@magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: "Linus Surguy" <linus@magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: No need for PSTN numbers -- use inet "phone numbers"
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Re: No need for PSTN numbers -- use inet "phone numbers"
From
: Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: No need for PSTN numbers -- use inet "phone numbers"
From
: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
No need for PSTN numbers -- use inet "phone numbers"
From
: Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono@vinny.org>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Blaine Christian <blaine.christian@mci.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
RE: Welcome!
From
: "Joe Goldberg" <joseph@ezzi.net>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: "Linus Surguy" <linus@magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: "Linus Surguy" <linus@magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
Re: Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: "Linus Surguy" <linus@magrathea-telecom.co.uk>
Re: VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono@vinny.org>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
VoIP peering: contradiction in terms
From
: John Todd <jtodd@loligo.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Need for working ENUM [was Re: Welcome! ]
From
: Peter Gradwell <peter@gradwell.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
RE: Welcome!
From
: "Vincent Rais" <vincent.rais@mad-ix.net>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
VOIP Peering
From
: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono@vinny.org>
LD VoIP Settlement [ was RE: Welcome!]
From
: "James Puckett" <jpuckett@e-c-group.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
RE: Welcome!
From
: "James Puckett" <jpuckett@e-c-group.com>
Re: Welcome!
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
RE: Welcome!
From
: "Nishant Ramachandran" <nramachandran@nrsoftware.com>
RE: Welcome!
From
: "Vincent Rais" <vincent.rais@mad-ix.net>
Welcome!
From
: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.6.10