Re: VOIP Peering Questions

[Duane <support@e164.org>]

Alex Bligh wrote:

> I say that because TRIP is, as I'm sure you are aware, very similar
> to BGP. We have coded BGP stuff before, and would probably code TRIP
> stuff if we thought it would be useful. So far I've yet to be convinced
> that several hundreds of thousands of lines of code later we'd not be
> left with just several hundreds of thousands of lines of code. But it's
> quite possible my imagination didn't extend sufficiently far beyond my
> near requirements.

My other worry about TRIP is it will end up like fuel pricing, with the 
prices going up and down like a yo yo because they can then get away 
with saying well we advertised it, you should have checked the split 
micro milli second before your call was connected...

--

Best regards,
 Duane

http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates
http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally
http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom
http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net!
http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers

"In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the
stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence."

--
To unsubscribe send a message to voip-peering-request@psg.com with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
An archive is at <http://psg.com/lists/voip-peering/>.