[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HTML Signature
- To: wl-en@lists.airs.net
- Subject: Re: HTML Signature
- From: Erik Hetzner <ehetzner@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:09:27 -0800
- Delivered-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D2voWD/cfeeulgItDQATY/aLVDurM+mQa9lgUDB7KRA=; b=IyNCBcAivDevxPvhhxzv9HWHxhiRDRkwgd73PuyMdPVE3AhhLKnkO6inVfsxKISIXa gU6U8SNMotVNonjZCMAQ1aJEIwTaWaXHrZ5rjKektBzU98DnExhYBVfb+wFUTdJNhLHY xLLw1DeuqdqMiftordOw62Wr/hPp2PatR0TY4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ogwjXS7h9ldHRIEdGSMbfzM6GxbnL0D+xGiDq3F8yscDVjO6tEQUV2Z9nqvuB/hLzA QYGH8htKbNqM834d/uCLAgZfKnxSzk51bFwd+xD4zJ4YxGvkIsitMBKkUVAjFNYsHMAk HbRZ/HeTO208tK7/q21ZUBdzkUcfFer1Eub2E=
- In-reply-to: <4b7a2e0b.9713f30a.27ef.4b9e@mx.google.com>
- List-help: <mailto:wl-en-ctl@lists.airs.net?body=help>
- List-id: wl-en.lists.airs.net
- List-owner: <mailto:wl-en-admin@lists.airs.net>
- List-post: <mailto:wl-en@lists.airs.net>
- List-software: fml [fml stable 20011102.2100]
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:wl-en-ctl@lists.airs.net?body=unsubscribe>
- References: <4b7a2e0b.9713f30a.27ef.4b9e@mx.google.com>
- Reply-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.2 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
This is a multipart/mixed message.
At Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:33:10 -0800,
docgnome wrote:
>
> Hi,
> So I just realized that the suggested fixes for using an html
> signature are less than ideal as they are actually attaching the file
> instead of it being in-line. This would require actually being able to
> compose html emails in wl. Any suggestion on how to go about doing
> this? I think the best solution would be to travel back in time and
> stop html email from being invented. Unfortunately, there is no M-x
> timetravel so I'll have to deal with it.
Hi Dave -
It is a perfectly legitimate MIME message that has type
multipart/mixed. MS Outlook tends to mangle these messages, pretending
that those parts are ‘attachments’, but many other clients (e.g.,
Thunderbird, Wanderlust) handle it fine.
-Erik
Here is a text/plain sig.
Here is a text/html sig.
Attachment:
pgpjJgC4zyJa_.pgp
Description: PGP signature