[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG

To: wl-en@lists.airs.net
Subject: Re: Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:46:48 +0200
Delivered-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
In-reply-to: <87ocnygx3l.wl%richard.lewis@gold.ac.uk>
List-help: <mailto:wl-en-ctl@lists.airs.net?body=help>
List-id: wl-en.lists.airs.net
List-owner: <mailto:wl-en-admin@lists.airs.net>
List-post: <mailto:wl-en@lists.airs.net>
List-software: fml [fml stable 20011102.2100]
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:wl-en-ctl@lists.airs.net?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
Organization: private site
References: <87ocnygx3l.wl%richard.lewis@gold.ac.uk>
Reply-to: wl-en@lists.airs.net
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20+20091011 (GNU/Linux 2.6.32-rc5-git2 x86_64)

On 23.10.2009, Richard Lewis wrote: 

> Anyway, is anyone using EMIKO? Does it work all right? Is it a better
> choice than SEMI + mailcrypt?

I have tried Emiko+easypg, it never managed to get the charset of
encrypted mails right. I have no opinion on mailcrypt because I've never
used it by myself.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG
  - From: Erik Hetzner <ehetzner@gmail.com>

References:
- Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG
  - From: Richard Lewis <richardlewis@fastmail.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG
Next by Date: Re: Bug: incorrect next message in Summary
Previous by thread: Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG
Next by thread: Re: Mailcrypt vs. EasyPG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread