At Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:59:21 +0100, mike@mikedeplume.com wrote: > According to dovecote, 'plain' is perfectly valid. I also manage the imap > server, so I know that I have set up the server so that it disables 'plain' if > tls is not used, and enables 'plain' if it is. When I try to login without tls > I get the correct response that 'plain' is not supported. I get no such > respopnse when trying tsl, so either wl has not got round to asking what the > server supports, or it has asked and found 'plain' to be accepted. clear is the wanderlust term for plain. What happens with: %remote_folder:"my.name@example.com"/clear@imap.example.com:993!! best, Erik
Attachment:
pgpWg7EOmm2Jl.pgp
Description: PGP signature