[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:34:05 -0800
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, iesg-secretary@ietf.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 11:37:05 -0800
Envelope-to: iesg-hack@psg.com
In-reply-to: <200301061925.h06JPD112418@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
List-help: <mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: <iesg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:iesg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iesg>,<mailto:iesg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200301061925.h06JPD112418@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
Sender: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Thomas,

  At least the boilerplate. If we decide we're happy
  with it and people have reviewed the meat, I wouldn't
  mind going further ;-p   If not, I'll be happy with
  the former only.

-- 
Alex

Monday, January 06, 2003, 11:25:13 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
>> Can I ask if anyone minds if we put the draft on the agenda for this
>> Thursday?

> To discuss as a normal draft that we should review, or to specifically
> discuss only the boilerplate issue?

> Or both?

> Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
- Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

References:
- Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
Next by Date: Re: Internet-Drafts rsync server
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
Next by thread: Re: draft-ietf-isis-traffic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread